Trump's victory is a triumph for right-wing extremism
Not many months ago Donald
trump was the joke candidate in the US presidential elections, the clown, the
bogeyman outsider. However, as Michael Moore noted perceptively at the time:
the pundits and political elite myopically underestimated the man and his
popular appeal because they were completely out of touch with ordinary people.
Almost a century ago another
man with a ridiculous moustache, a shrill voice and theatrical gestures was
also mocked. On the back of mass unemployment and poverty in the country as
well as widespread dissatisfaction with the mainstream parties, he rose rapidly
to power. Like Trump, he also promised to make his country great again and rid
it of the ‘vermin’ who were undermining the nation’s moral fibre and its
economy. I’m not suggesting that Trump is the new Hitler, but there are very
worrying parallels. Just look at what Trump has said during his campaign and
who he is appointing to his new cabinet.
His
main campaign slogan, ‘Make American great again’, and his major promises to
improve the US economy by emphasising ‘straight talking’, patriotism and
standing against ‘political correctness’, could have come straight out of Dr.
Goebbel’s propaganda bible, in which he emphasised the need to ‘avoid abstract ideas - appeal to the emotions; constantly repeat just a few ideas, use stereotyped phrases; give
only one side of the argument; continuously criticize your opponents; and pick
out one “enemy” for special vilification. Sound familiar?
Trump is not a natural master of rhetoric, but he
has internalised the points Goebbels makes, and is playing on the fears of
those whose jobs are at risk, whose communities have been devastated by
capitalist greed, by blaming immigrants and foreigners:
‘I will build a
great wall – and nobody builds walls better than me … I will build a great,
great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall.
Mark my words’, he repeated.
‘When Mexico sends its people, they’re not
sending the best. They’re not sending you, they’re sending people that have
lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems to us. They’re bringing
drugs. They’re bring crime. They’re rapists… And some, I assume, are good
people.’
Not satisfied with a vilification of
Mexicans, he turned on the Muslims, calling for a ban on Muslims entering the
USA.
His racism
is further underlined by his remarks about Obama, first doubting the details of
his birth and then implying that he is associated with (black) thugs: ‘Our
great African-American President hasn’t exactly had a positive impact on the
thugs who are so happily and openly destroying Baltimore, he said.’
As if that were not enough, he has views on global warming that are Medieval: ‘It’s freezing and snowing in New York – we need global warming!’, he quipped. He has also appointed a climate change denier to oversee the transition of the Environmental Protection Agency and he is planning to quit the Paris Climate Deal.
In his first interview with CBS after his election, Trump said: that he would expel or jail up to 3 million
undocumented immigrants from the US who are ‘criminal’. And that future Supreme Court
nominees would be ‘pro-life’ – i.e. anti-abortion, and would defend the
constitutional right to bear arms.
All this should have set alarm bells ringing around the globe and invoked outrage, but instead Trump is rapidly becoming accepted by government leaders and the mainstream media. It’s not unlike the way Hitler, Franco and all the other dictators were treated in their day, with kid gloves – it’s called appeasement.
In Trump’s
case the apple has clearly not fallen far from the tree. His father, Fred
Trump, was once arrested at a KKK rally and was sued by the US Justice
Department for refusing to rent flats to African-Americans. Donald Trump inherited
his property owning father’s wealth which was lucky as he was clearly no
high-flyer at school. He was expelled at the age of 13 and sent to the New York
military academy.
Most
past US presidents have been right-wing but we broadly knew that we were
getting what it said on the packet. With Trump, for the first time, we have an
unpredictable, but reactionary individual.
It is,
though, not only Trump we should fear but those extreme right-wingers he is
appointing to his cabinet. His chief strategist is Steve Bannon, a former
Goldman Sachs investment banker who runs the right-wing Breitbart News Network
website, and appears to be as misogynist as Trump.
Buzzfeed
quotes Bannon as saying,
that ‘one
of the unintended consequences of the women’s liberation movement is that ‘the
women that would lead this country would be feminine, they would be pro-family,
they would have husbands, they would love their children. They wouldn’t be a
bunch of dykes that came from the 7 Sisters schools’.
Bannon has connections to the alt-right
– a loose group of people with far right
ideologies who reject even mainstream conservatism in the US and believe
in white supremecy. He believes that those
who believe in a progressive agenda espouse a philosophy of victimhood: ‘They’re either a victim of race.
They’re victim of their sexual preference. They’re a victim of gender. All
about victimhood and the United States is the great oppressor, not the great
liberator,’ he says.
In the divorce court
Bannon’s ex-wife Louise Piccard accused him of being an anti-semite, saying
that he had made antisemitic remarks about choice of schools, not
wishing to send his daughters to a local school beloved of Jewish families because ‘Jews raise their
children to be whiny brats’. He has denied the accusation.
If Bannon’s actual words
don’t disqualify him from holding a top position in the Trump White House,
the headlines he published at Breitbart should: ‘Birth control makes women unattractive and
crazy’. ‘There’s no
hiring bias against women in tech. They just suck at interviews’. ‘World Health
Organisation report: Trannies 49x higher HIV rate’.
Then
there is Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC), who
has been appointed as Trump’s chief of staff. He worked to bring Wisconsin's Tea Party
movement together with the mainstream Republican party organization.
Newt Gingrich
is another close adviser to Trump. He was one of those influential advisers to Ronald
Reagan who adopted his idea of an
‘opportunity society’ as laid out in his book, Window of Opportunity.
Gingrich encouraged Republicans to ‘speak like Newt’ and put out a memo containing
lists of words with negative connotations such as ‘radical’, ‘sick’ and
‘traitors’. That, too, could have come from Goebbel’s notebook. That is how
fake news and lies become mainstream, particularly when magnified by the
right-wing press and other media.
Boris Johnson,
our modern-day version of Chamberlain, is likely to meet Gingrich when he visits
the States shortly. He claimed Trump’s election should be seen as a ‘moment of
opportunity’ for the UK. After complaining about the ‘whinge-o-rama’ in
response to the election result, he added: ‘I think there is a lot to be
positive about and it is very important not to pre-judge the president-elect or
his administration’.
Theresa May
also appeared to support Trump’s stance when speaking this week at the Lord
Mayor’s banquet, when she adopted her tribune of the working people pose: ‘People – often those on modest to low
incomes living in rich countries like our own – see their jobs being outsourced
and wages undercut. They see their communities changing around them and don’t
remember agreeing to that change,” … ‘When you fail to see that the liberal
consensus that has held sway for decades (sic) has failed to maintain the
consent of many people, you’re not the champion of liberalism but the enemy of
it,’ she said. In other words, Trump’s election is the answer to years of
failed liberalism.
We have
to demand of our government that it has no truck with Trump and his vitriol. If
he is not vehemently opposed and his dangerous rhetoric exposed, the insidious
march of right-wing populism will gain traction elsewhere too.
No comments:
Post a Comment