Soldiers, Spies and Statesmen – Egypt’s
Road to Revolt
By Hazem Kandil
Pubs. Verso 2012
Hdbck. £16.99
If you want to understand the underlying forces and
mechanisms of Egypt’s
recent revolutionary turmoil, you couldn’t find a more informative book than this.
Beyond its detailed analysis of the historical forces that culminated in the Tahrir
Square demonstrations and regime change, it also
has relevance for understanding revolutionary change everywhere. In his introduction
the author says: ‘To study revolution is to study how the masses awaken from
their slumber and thrust themselves on the centre stage of their own history
only to watch their aspirations either usurped or repressed.’ This rather
fatalistic conclusion is, as we well know, too often the historical truth.
Kandil was born in Egypt
and now lectures at Cambridge. His
deep knowledge and understanding of Egyptian politics within the wider world
context is impressive. The main thrust of his argument is that the Egyptian
revolution was able to gather strength not as a direct result of spontaneous
uprisings of the people, but as a result of infighting between the three
pillars of Egyptian state power: the military, the security services and the
political elite. He takes us back to the origins of modern Egypt
in order to demonstrate his case convincingly. From British colonial rule,
through Nasser, the Suez
debacle and the catastrophic six days war with Israel,
via Sadat, Mubarak and the Muslim Brotherhood government of today. In this
history, he reveals how, after the Second World War, the CIA
‘loaned’ former top Nazi SS and Gestapo officers to the Egyptian regime to help
it in its struggle against communism and democratic change and to ensure Egypt
remained in the western orbit.
The reason the Mubarak regime was unable to successfully suppress
the people’s demands for democracy, he argues, was that the military, unhappy
with the leading role given to Mubarak’s notorious security services, was
unwilling to allow itself to be used as a tool of suppression or be seen as a continuing
supporter of the unpopular corrupt business and political class; it viewed the
uprising as an opportunity to re-establish its prominence and status in the
country.
A valuable contribution to our understanding of Middle
Eastern politics and to comprehending the mechanisms of revolutionary change in
general.
No comments:
Post a Comment