Tinkering with the system won’t solve the fundamental contradictions
If anyone is in debt, they need to be helped to climb out of
it. And the best way of doing this is to provide them with the means of earning
sufficient income and ensuring repayment stages are realistic and feasible.
Seems common sense, doesn’t it? But the IMF and the European Bank are doing
exactly the opposite in their treatment of the chief debtor nations of the
Euro-zone. This can only make a bad situation worse.
The main reason these countries are in big economic trouble
and why most of the developing countries are too is the result of lax banking
regulation. Priority number one should be for governments worldwide to impose
proper regulation on banks’ lending and investment policies. Once that has been
done, you’d think the next priority would be to redirect investment to public
infrastructure projects. This would create employment, increase tax revenues
and be a second step on the road to paying off the enormous debts. It would
also ensure social cohesion. These are the sort of policies Roosevelt
pursued in the thirties and what the Labour government did after the end of the
war. These aren’t socialist solutions, they’re a means, if there are any left,
of saving capitalism. But the dogma of neo-liberalism has penetrated so deeply
into government psyches and economic thinking that such suggestions are viewed
as the worst form of apostasy. Their view is that it would tantamount to
admitting that ‘free market capitalism’ has not worked.
It is one of the central contradictions of capitalism that
profits are most easily increased by reducing wage bills and cutting jobs
through ‘efficiency’ savings, but the corollary of this is that workers have
less income to spend, or little at all if they are unemployed. Thus there is
less money in circulation to buy manufactured goods, so company profits are
reduced yet further and the vicious circle continues. This is exactly what is
happening in Europe and in the wider world now.
Taking the examples of Spain,
Greece and Portugal,
the austerity measures demanded by the bankers have meant drastic wage
reductions, rises in unemployment to unheard of levels, while at the same time
cut-backs in public spending are imposed. Young people are queuing up to leave
these countries simply to find work. There is social breakdown, mass poverty
and anger. There is no chance in hell of these countries being able to emerge out
of the present mess through such policies. Where can the impetus come from? Who
will invest in such unstable and volatile countries? Why can’t even the wise
capitalists see this? The main reason is that the ruling elites are locked into
a neo-liberal way of thinking, and also because, despite the chaos brought
about by the financial institutions, and the flak they have taken for this, they
are still calling the shots. The global financiers can only see Pound, Euro and
Dollar signs in front of their eyes and can’t relate to real production,
manufacturing and society. They want to squeeze interest out of the indebted
countries come what may.
The increased financialisation of the whole capitalist
system over recent decades has also meant that investors have sought more rapid
returns on their money and bigger and bigger profits than can easily be
obtained by investing in manufacturing or sustainable agriculture. This has
accelerated the take-over frenzy, asset-stripping and closures. It is short-termism
gone insane. It has meant companies are no longer able to undertake long-term
planning as investments are now made on the basis of short-term profitability
potentials. The insatiable greed of the big banking institutions means that they
are demanding big returns now, and don’t care what happens a few years down the
line. This attitude has been behind hedge fund casino economics, the derivative
markets and price movement speculation in raw materials, shoddy building
projects and internet bubbles.
These are the central contradictions and unless the
leadership of the Labour Party is prepared to address them, no amount of
tinkering at the edges, as Ed Balls appears to be suggesting, will help.
END